Feedback

Severity: Status: Filter:

12345678910...>>
ID DateSeverityStatusFeedback
102589531025895318/05/2013 05:42:18NormalNewprice of 5mg of Picralinal, picrinine,Alschomine
3553616355361615/05/2013 05:30:52HighNew2,2,2',2',4,4'-Hexamethyl-1,1',2,2',3,4-hexahydro-4,6'-biquinoline
266389052663890506/05/2013 10:40:19NormalNewClearly drawn as Z (which I suspect it isn't), should be a crossed = bond. Draw this and move all data to new record ??
7934793428/04/2013 03:27:30NormalNewwhat is the different between MGK isomer a and MGK isomer b?
120411204123/04/2013 11:11:32NormalNewThere are 5 MeSH data sources for this compound, 4 of which are incorrect in stronger or weaker points. C076597 and C097386 are drug combinations containing cs:12041. D004917 is the correct link. D015643 is another derived compound, and D020312 is "Emu" (The bird, Dromaius novaehollandiae).
3220322023/04/2013 09:52:51NormalNewLooking at the two MeSH mesh:D005277 mesh:D020372, I see that Fenfluramin should be the R and Dexfenfluramin should be the R stereo-isomer. In ChemSpider, the undefined stereo-isomer links to both, and dexfenfluramin is also a separate compound named "adifax".
45556445556420/04/2013 20:40:23NormalNewCAS # search of ChemSpider with 68989-02-6 retrieves carbanolate. A Google search of the same cas # retrieves a cationic detergent, Alkyl* dimethyl 3,4-dichlorobenzyl ammonium chloride *(63% C12, 23% C14, 14% C16)
39693339693320/04/2013 15:18:30NormalNewCarbon-11? Is that a real thing? Also, it's not labelled in the underlying molfile ==> bug.
4574202457420219/04/2013 10:21:26NormalNewThank you for your explanation on my earlier comment! Now that I understand the blue (II), I would like to point out that many of the PAHs I have checked give the same result. For example, the C16H9 pyrene radical (ID 16380885). I do find it informative to see the name of the corresponding hydrogenated molecule, however the ChemSpider database therefore misleads the reader about MW and other properties. I hope this is helpful. Joel.
2923078292307818/04/2013 07:45:45NormalNewWhy are the InChi's missing ??
131126371311263714/04/2013 17:06:17NormalNewRe http://cdsouthan.blogspot.se/2013/04/joining-in-with-post-acs-new-drug.html This should now have MGL-3196 added. Cheers, Chris
199700531997005308/04/2013 21:19:10NormalNewCAS 1005-39-6 is for 2-methylmercapto (methylthio)- thus record most likely for this compound which already exists on file
290812908108/04/2013 17:52:59NormalNewVery good...I will be using it in the future. Will love if you would include chemical compound formulas too. I see molecular compound formulas only and there is a difference. Thanks very much.
660326603205/04/2013 08:03:10NormalNewsmiles are not correct
134338191343381928/03/2013 10:01:46NormalNewthis is a duplicate of ID#61366 The spelling is incorrect and the structure is displayed as a tautomeric form which this molecule has not been proven to adopt, either in crystal structure or in solution.
173400961734009628/03/2013 09:35:23NormalNewNot sure if the previous feedback worked (no confirmation box?) This looks like Acetochlor ESA Na salt - our smiles without Na is: S(=O)(=O)(O)CC(=O)N(-c(c(cc1)C)c(c1)CC)COCC But this isn't Alachlor ESA Na salt as indicated in synonyms - our smiles for Alachlor ESA is: CCC1=CC=CC(CC)=C1N(COC)C(=O)CS(O)(=O)=O and there is a N-Me-O-Me not N-Me-O-Et.
173400961734009628/03/2013 09:29:03NormalNewIt looks like this compound is correctly labeled as Acetochlor ESA sodium salt; the smiles for Acetochlor ESA (according to our records) is S(=O)(=O)(O)CC(=O)N(-c(c(cc1)C)c(c1)CC)COCC But this is should not be labeled Alachlor ESA sodium salt as indicated; our SMILES for Alachlor ESA is CCC1=CC=CC(CC)=C1N(COC)C(=O)CS(O)(=O)=O There is a Me on the N-Me-O-Me, not a Et like Acetochlor.
232570082325700827/03/2013 19:40:38NormalNewI suspect this structure is incorrect, should be CC([C@@H](C(NC([C@@H]([C@@H]([C@H]([C@H](C(NC([C@H](C(C)C)C)=O)=O)Oc1ccc(C2=CSC=C2)cc1)O)O)O)=O)=O)C)C
137981211379812126/03/2013 06:40:58NormalNewnote to Dave sent to his EMail account
241872242418722425/03/2013 09:04:28NormalNewI bet this is meant to be a benzene ring !! Another Molport malfunction !
12345678910...>>

Feedback Form