RSC
SyntheticPages
Login
Register
About
What is ChemSpider?
ChemSpider Blog
Data Sources
The Team
Advisory Group
Collaborators
Present Sponsors
Sponsor ChemSpider
Advertise
More Searches
Simple search
Structure search
Advanced search
Search History
Web APIs
Help
FAQ
Help
Getting Started
Forum
SiteMap
<< Back
Posted Date:
26/12/2012 00:58:50
Severity:
Normal
Status:
New
Posted Comments:
I think that the SMILES for Buckminsterfullerene is not correct. While it is true that all the carbon atoms are identical, it is incorrect to ascibe to them the conventional (benzene) aromatic type. There are two types of bond; those that are in the five membered rings, and the "nearly double" bonds that join the five membered rings. A better SMILES is that one that is listed in "Molecular Modelling; Computational Chemistry Demystfied", p.279, Bladon , Gorton and Hammond, RSC Publishing 2011.
Curated Date:
Verdict:
Generate Leads
Advertise
Sponsor
Advertisements
Also from the RSC