Micrococcin P1 Part 2 and the Advantages of Online Publishing
Posted by: Antony Williams in Uncategorized
A couple of days ago I asked whether readers could see any issues with the structure of Micrococcin P1 published in the C&E News article this week. A few people took a stab on blog and off blog but only Stuart Cantrill from the Nature Publishing Group got it right. One double bond in the wrong place. Subtle, but rather important. General structure drawing tools will help with things like this. For example, a human might not see the issue in the structure of Taxol to the left very easily. Software tools designed to flag valency issues will show the issue easily.
In the expanded image the pentavalent carbon is marked.
The same type of tools would have shown a positive charge on the sulphur in the ring for the incorrect structure of Micrococcin.In the same way, software tools can recognize charge imbalances and incomplete stereochemistry.
I sent an email to the editor of C&E News when I noticed the structure issue but didn’t get a response. Nevertheless it is an advantage of online publications that images can be swapped out easily. This has been done for the online article here at this point and the change, while subtle, is there (shown below). 
The structure is now on the ChemSpider database here.
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=8c0d9e20-41f4-4732-967f-6bac7c0e5739)
Entries (RSS)