<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Over Two and a Half Thousand Registered Users on ChemSpider&#8230;And Growing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemspider.com/blog/2500-registered-users-on-chemspiderand-growing.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/2500-registered-users-on-chemspiderand-growing.html</link>
	<description>Building Community for Chemists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:16:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/2500-registered-users-on-chemspiderand-growing.html/comment-page-1#comment-138557</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=1089#comment-138557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Egon, Your questions are good questions but I&#039;ll confess that I haven&#039;t navigated my way through all of the logfiles to determine the answers and don&#039;t have time to do so at present. But, I&#039;ll make a judgment call based on historical observations

1) We&#039;re averaging 6000 unique users per day and 10s of 1000s of transactions. I should think that the majority of registrants are users
2) I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a bias between registered/non-registered in terms of looking at spectra
3) People have different interests of course but they seem to like the synonyms, physchem properties and links to external data sources primarily.
4) It&#039;s difficult to get that granularity
5) InChI is popular among most people and there are a lot of InChI searches going on. Standard InChI is brand new and hardly touched.
6) The majority of registered users do NOT contribute - it is a small group of people who do. And we really appreciate their contributions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Egon, Your questions are good questions but I&#8217;ll confess that I haven&#8217;t navigated my way through all of the logfiles to determine the answers and don&#8217;t have time to do so at present. But, I&#8217;ll make a judgment call based on historical observations</p>
<p>1) We&#8217;re averaging 6000 unique users per day and 10s of 1000s of transactions. I should think that the majority of registrants are users<br />
2) I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a bias between registered/non-registered in terms of looking at spectra<br />
3) People have different interests of course but they seem to like the synonyms, physchem properties and links to external data sources primarily.<br />
4) It&#8217;s difficult to get that granularity<br />
5) InChI is popular among most people and there are a lot of InChI searches going on. Standard InChI is brand new and hardly touched.<br />
6) The majority of registered users do NOT contribute &#8211; it is a small group of people who do. And we really appreciate their contributions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egon Willighagen</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/2500-registered-users-on-chemspiderand-growing.html/comment-page-1#comment-138460</link>
		<dc:creator>Egon Willighagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=1089#comment-138460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, the clear follow up questions are:

* how many registered users are active instead of lurkers?
* are there differences in how registered and unregistered user lurk^Wsearch CS?
** e.g. do registered users look at more spectra (or other way around)
** are there other bits of specialized properties they like?
** do they overlap with what they contribute?
** how popular is the (S)InChI amongst both groups?
* what the median amount of contribution made per registered user?

I would not expect you to have this answer right away, but would be insightful to see how chemists use chemical databases? Which bits of information they access, etc.

In the past I worked at a open source start up (LogReport), which never took off due to the lack of a good salesman, where we wrote software for data analysis of site traffic (not just web, but email, ftp, etc)... It&#039;s basically Google Analytics for free, but without the nice graphics... (which might also explain why it never really took off). Debian/Ubuntu users can install it from the &#039;lire&#039; package...)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the clear follow up questions are:</p>
<p>* how many registered users are active instead of lurkers?<br />
* are there differences in how registered and unregistered user lurk^Wsearch CS?<br />
** e.g. do registered users look at more spectra (or other way around)<br />
** are there other bits of specialized properties they like?<br />
** do they overlap with what they contribute?<br />
** how popular is the (S)InChI amongst both groups?<br />
* what the median amount of contribution made per registered user?</p>
<p>I would not expect you to have this answer right away, but would be insightful to see how chemists use chemical databases? Which bits of information they access, etc.</p>
<p>In the past I worked at a open source start up (LogReport), which never took off due to the lack of a good salesman, where we wrote software for data analysis of site traffic (not just web, but email, ftp, etc)&#8230; It&#8217;s basically Google Analytics for free, but without the nice graphics&#8230; (which might also explain why it never really took off). Debian/Ubuntu users can install it from the &#8216;lire&#8217; package&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
