<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chemistry Document Markup and Free Access Structure-Based Searching of Publications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemspider.com/blog/chemistry-document-markup-and-free-access-structure-based-searching-of-publications.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/chemistry-document-markup-and-free-access-structure-based-searching-of-publications.html</link>
	<description>Building Community for Chemists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 05:28:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/chemistry-document-markup-and-free-access-structure-based-searching-of-publications.html/comment-page-1#comment-78564</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 07:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=728#comment-78564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is obviously inherent value in this, but traditionally chemists don&#039;t seem to want to go the supplementary information route if they can help it, with the exception of NMR spectroscopists and X-ray crystallographers, of course. I suspects adding a step to the publication process will not be taken up very enthusiastically even if it would be of great mutual benefit to the community.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is obviously inherent value in this, but traditionally chemists don&#8217;t seem to want to go the supplementary information route if they can help it, with the exception of NMR spectroscopists and X-ray crystallographers, of course. I suspects adding a step to the publication process will not be taken up very enthusiastically even if it would be of great mutual benefit to the community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
