http://www.chemspider.com/blog/chemspider-structure-images-migrating-to-rsc-compound-pages.html Building Community for Chemists Tue, 14 May 2013 21:50:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 http://www.chemspider.com/blog/chemspider-structure-images-migrating-to-rsc-compound-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-195079 Richard Kidd Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:10:13 +0000 http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=1551#comment-195079 Good point Egon. We use the non-standard InChI internally for Prospect markup as some of the additional options are useful. However, we didn’t think it was worth it to make a short-term fix to sort out our internal Prospect compound database to display the 1S/, when this database is being migrated into ChemSpider and our new MarkLogic-based publishing platform. As ever (hands up here), ‘short-term’ became a bit longer than we expected. It’ll be sorted out in the next few months as we reengineer our publishing processes, and in the meantime we’ll happily supply a standard InChI to anyone who writes in on a postcard

]]> http://www.chemspider.com/blog/chemspider-structure-images-migrating-to-rsc-compound-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-195078 Egon Willighagen Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:46:08 +0000 http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=1551#comment-195078 I see that the info box shows the InChI=1/, and not the InChI=1S/ … why is that? Any particular reason why the InChI=1/ should still be supported?

]]>