<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How many ways to search ChemSpider?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemspider.com/blog/how-many-ways-to-search-chemspider.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/how-many-ways-to-search-chemspider.html</link>
	<description>Building Community for Chemists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:16:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/how-many-ways-to-search-chemspider.html/comment-page-1#comment-195430</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=3224#comment-195430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We do not have the ability to search against both mass and chemical shifts I&#039;m afraid. As an NMR jock and structure elucidation specialist by training I agree that it would be a very useful approach. It would require every structure to have associated spectra, 26 million chemicals in total and at present we have around 2000 spectra only. So, it would require prediction of spectra across the database, storage and search methods for querying shifts and mass. It&#039;s all technically feasible except we don&#039;t have access to NMR prediction technology to generate 1D H1 and C13 spectra cross the entire database unfortunately.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We do not have the ability to search against both mass and chemical shifts I&#8217;m afraid. As an NMR jock and structure elucidation specialist by training I agree that it would be a very useful approach. It would require every structure to have associated spectra, 26 million chemicals in total and at present we have around 2000 spectra only. So, it would require prediction of spectra across the database, storage and search methods for querying shifts and mass. It&#8217;s all technically feasible except we don&#8217;t have access to NMR prediction technology to generate 1D H1 and C13 spectra cross the entire database unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James McKenzie</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/how-many-ways-to-search-chemspider.html/comment-page-1#comment-195427</link>
		<dc:creator>James McKenzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=3224#comment-195427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have a facility to search against both mass and chemical shifts?  Obviously it would require the NMR spectrum to be uploaded and converted to a peak list.  Such a facility would be really useful for spectral identification in complex mixtures, where masses and chemical shifts are strongly correlated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a facility to search against both mass and chemical shifts?  Obviously it would require the NMR spectrum to be uploaded and converted to a peak list.  Such a facility would be really useful for spectral identification in complex mixtures, where masses and chemical shifts are strongly correlated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
