Comments on: My Presentation on Text-Mining and Document Mark-up at ACS http://www.chemspider.com/blog/my-presentation-on-text-mining-and-document-mark-up-at-acs.html Building Community for Chemists Fri, 10 Feb 2012 11:07:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2 By: Chem4Word Project from Microsoft and Murray-Rust at The ChemConnector Blog by Antony Williams - Observations and Musings for the Chemistry Community By Antony Williams http://www.chemspider.com/blog/my-presentation-on-text-mining-and-document-mark-up-at-acs.html/comment-page-1#comment-76246 Chem4Word Project from Microsoft and Murray-Rust at The ChemConnector Blog by Antony Williams - Observations and Musings for the Chemistry Community By Antony Williams Mon, 25 Aug 2008 04:09:50 +0000 http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=705#comment-76246 [...] on from my presentation regarding text-mining and document mark-up at the ACS meeting in Philly it was interesting to see the announcement about the Chem4Word project [...] [...] on from my presentation regarding text-mining and document mark-up at the ACS meeting in Philly it was interesting to see the announcement about the Chem4Word project [...]

]]> By: Tobias Kind http://www.chemspider.com/blog/my-presentation-on-text-mining-and-document-mark-up-at-acs.html/comment-page-1#comment-73455 Tobias Kind Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:40:02 +0000 http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=705#comment-73455 Hi Tony, I can only congratulate you and your team and hope everything works well in the future. You and your team have done so much for small molecule sciences. This includes of course also the innovative pushes form eMolecules and PubChem. Many people from metabolomics and also companies are grateful for that. You can see that probably from your log files. I know this doesn't buy you any coffee, but some spiritual support may not be wrong. "We foresee a situation where authors submit an article to our markup system AHEAD of submission to a publisher. We will validate chemical names, allow authors to confirm the structure-name associations, deposit their structures to ChemSpider under embargo" That is great news, I guess even if nobody knows the outcome but that is a good starter. Chemistry journals or authors may opt-in during the beginning or it can become a requirement for every chemistry related publication. Nobody knows where this is going, but its the right direction. It will allow a semantic connection of content and molecules with (hopefully) free access also in the future. Kind regard Tobias Kind fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu Hi Tony,
I can only congratulate you and your team and hope everything works well in the future. You and your team have done so much for small molecule sciences. This includes of course also the innovative pushes form eMolecules and PubChem. Many people from metabolomics and also companies are grateful for that. You can see that probably from your log files. I know this doesn’t buy you any coffee, but some spiritual support may not be wrong.

“We foresee a situation where authors submit an article to our markup system AHEAD of submission to a publisher. We will validate chemical names, allow authors to confirm the structure-name associations, deposit their structures to ChemSpider under embargo”

That is great news, I guess even if nobody knows the outcome but that is a good starter. Chemistry journals or authors may opt-in during the beginning or it can become a requirement for every chemistry related publication. Nobody knows where this is going, but its the right direction. It will allow a semantic connection of content and molecules with (hopefully) free access also in the future.

Kind regard
Tobias Kind
fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu

]]> By: Egon Willighagen http://www.chemspider.com/blog/my-presentation-on-text-mining-and-document-mark-up-at-acs.html/comment-page-1#comment-72891 Egon Willighagen Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:00:47 +0000 http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=705#comment-72891 I like point 4: this is the way it should be: integrate chemoinformatics into the publishing process! You might even add checking of spectra for structures, and other experimental evidence etc. Extracting info from experimental sections is certainly more difficult than processing names (but possible; check my blog for a Bioclipse plugin based on work by PMRs group), but certainly more worthwhile too. Cheers! I like point 4: this is the way it should be: integrate chemoinformatics into the publishing process! You might even add checking of spectra for structures, and other experimental evidence etc. Extracting info from experimental sections is certainly more difficult than processing names (but possible; check my blog for a Bioclipse plugin based on work by PMRs group), but certainly more worthwhile too.

Cheers!

]]>