<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presentation at the German Conference for Cheminformatics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemspider.com/blog/presentation-at-the-german-conference-for-cheminformatics.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/presentation-at-the-german-conference-for-cheminformatics.html</link>
	<description>Building Community for Chemists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:50:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Sitzmann</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/presentation-at-the-german-conference-for-cheminformatics.html/comment-page-1#comment-195042</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Sitzmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=1494#comment-195042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice talk! I am also impressed about 119 slides in 35(?) minutes. My favorite slide - of course - is slide 47 - do I finally get famous for this rushed-in-5-minutes graphic :-)? Regarding the Digitonin example and crowdsourced curating at Chemspider: is there already a final verdict what the correct structure is? It would be cool if such discussions would be in one place - and the discussion could be recapitulated easily by somebody who didn&#039;t participate in the discussion originally. For the Digitonin discussion  I saw the problem that it kind of branched out into too many channels (mail, blog replies, articles in other blogs, twitter, friendfeed discussions ...), maybe Google Wave linked into ChemSpider in some way is the right tool for this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice talk! I am also impressed about 119 slides in 35(?) minutes. My favorite slide &#8211; of course &#8211; is slide 47 &#8211; do I finally get famous for this rushed-in-5-minutes graphic <img src='http://www.chemspider.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ? Regarding the Digitonin example and crowdsourced curating at Chemspider: is there already a final verdict what the correct structure is? It would be cool if such discussions would be in one place &#8211; and the discussion could be recapitulated easily by somebody who didn&#8217;t participate in the discussion originally. For the Digitonin discussion  I saw the problem that it kind of branched out into too many channels (mail, blog replies, articles in other blogs, twitter, friendfeed discussions &#8230;), maybe Google Wave linked into ChemSpider in some way is the right tool for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
