<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rich Text Formatting and Substructure Searchable Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemspider.com/blog/rich-text-formatting-and-substructure-searchable-blogs.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/rich-text-formatting-and-substructure-searchable-blogs.html</link>
	<description>Building Community for Chemists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Kurt Wegenr</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/rich-text-formatting-and-substructure-searchable-blogs.html/comment-page-1#comment-63252</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Kurt Wegenr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=687#comment-63252</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the flowers, but rich text editing is like any other office tool, means very easy to use. And the versioning on the entries is marvellous news, especially when facing silly spammers entering additional viagra links, suspicious company links, or a few (almost invisible) xxx words into long texts.

And for the Tekki&#039;s reading this, it is really &#039;rich&#039; text editing with a lot of extra parameters for people getting fancy about formatting and layout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the flowers, but rich text editing is like any other office tool, means very easy to use. And the versioning on the entries is marvellous news, especially when facing silly spammers entering additional viagra links, suspicious company links, or a few (almost invisible) xxx words into long texts.</p>
<p>And for the Tekki&#8217;s reading this, it is really &#8216;rich&#8217; text editing with a lot of extra parameters for people getting fancy about formatting and layout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Kurt Wegenr</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/rich-text-formatting-and-substructure-searchable-blogs.html/comment-page-1#comment-63250</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Kurt Wegenr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=687#comment-63250</guid>
		<description>Two more comments on this
1. I think InChIKey&#039;s are ways better than InChI itself, because the special characters and non-word or non-sentence like lookalike.
See Rich&#039;s post on this
http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/03/05/why-the-web-isnt-ready-for-chemistry

2. For a chemical aware blog, I would refer to Egon&#039;s concept used on the chemical blogspace aggregation as well.
http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2006/12/including-smiles-cml-and-inchi-in.html
This is basically just checking blog feeds for the RDF entries and puts them as molecules into the aggregation system. See it here in action (being more exact post-processing action)
http://cb.openmolecules.net/inchis.php

In other words, beside the active hosting of content, I highly appreciate, the blog content of blogs could get indexed fairly easy, if bloggers would follow some rules.

@Egon, Rich, Noel: Any more comments on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two more comments on this<br />
1. I think InChIKey&#8217;s are ways better than InChI itself, because the special characters and non-word or non-sentence like lookalike.<br />
See Rich&#8217;s post on this<br />
<a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/03/05/why-the-web-isnt-ready-for-chemistry" rel="nofollow">http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/03/05/why-the-web-isnt-ready-for-chemistry</a></p>
<p>2. For a chemical aware blog, I would refer to Egon&#8217;s concept used on the chemical blogspace aggregation as well.<br />
<a href="http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2006/12/including-smiles-cml-and-inchi-in.html" rel="nofollow">http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/2006/12/including-smiles-cml-and-inchi-in.html</a><br />
This is basically just checking blog feeds for the RDF entries and puts them as molecules into the aggregation system. See it here in action (being more exact post-processing action)<br />
<a href="http://cb.openmolecules.net/inchis.php" rel="nofollow">http://cb.openmolecules.net/inchis.php</a></p>
<p>In other words, beside the active hosting of content, I highly appreciate, the blog content of blogs could get indexed fairly easy, if bloggers would follow some rules.</p>
<p>@Egon, Rich, Noel: Any more comments on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
