<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Datasets Project Comes to An End &#8211; Oh My Chemistry &#8211; Who Cares For You?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chemspider.com/blog/the-google-datasets-project-comes-to-an-end-oh-my-chemistry-who-cares-for-you.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/the-google-datasets-project-comes-to-an-end-oh-my-chemistry-who-cares-for-you.html</link>
	<description>Building Community for Chemists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:05:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joerg Kurt Wegner</title>
		<link>http://www.chemspider.com/blog/the-google-datasets-project-comes-to-an-end-oh-my-chemistry-who-cares-for-you.html/comment-page-1#comment-127282</link>
		<dc:creator>Joerg Kurt Wegner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chemspider.com/blog/?p=961#comment-127282</guid>
		<description>Focus, I guess most of us have heard that more than once, especially for those of us in industry. Anyway, its maybe not only the syntax problem of the InChI, but also the &#039;deep web&#039; problem, making it difficult for indexing services.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Web

And would that not a beautiful follow-up paper taking the work of Peter, Henry, and of course, Rich into account ?
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b502828k
http://depth-first.com/articles/search?q=inchi

Maybe we need to find a &#039;deep-web&#039; and search engine expert to write a comment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Focus, I guess most of us have heard that more than once, especially for those of us in industry. Anyway, its maybe not only the syntax problem of the InChI, but also the &#8216;deep web&#8217; problem, making it difficult for indexing services.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Web" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Web</a></p>
<p>And would that not a beautiful follow-up paper taking the work of Peter, Henry, and of course, Rich into account ?<br />
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b502828k" rel="nofollow">http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b502828k</a><br />
<a href="http://depth-first.com/articles/search?q=inchi" rel="nofollow">http://depth-first.com/articles/search?q=inchi</a></p>
<p>Maybe we need to find a &#8216;deep-web&#8217; and search engine expert to write a comment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
